Report of future crime not protected under whistleblower act
The Supreme Court of Michigan has held that the state’s Whistleblower Protection Act does not protect an employee who is terminated because she reported a coworker’s plan to violate a law in the future. The “plain language” of the Act provides protection only against retaliation for a report of an act or conduct that has actually occurred or is ongoing, the Court said. Barbara Pace worked for SIREN Eaton Shelter, a nonprofit providing services to survivors of domestic violence. She claimed that the organization’s operations manager had told her that she intended to use SIREN grant money to purchase a stove for her daughter and implied that Pace should document the transaction in the name of...
The full text of this article is available to paid subscribers only. Login or subscribe to read more